Howard County Executive Ken Ulman has submitted legislation to the County Council to create a stormwater utility fee – a new revenue stream mandated by state law (attached).
“This is a step we have to take, and it is a step that is right to take,” Ulman said when he announced the legislation with Councilman Calvin Ball, D-2. “Howard County will do its part to keep our waters clean. Uncontrolled stormwater runoff is a significant problem that has been overlooked too long.”
Stormwater runoff – rainwater that is not absorbed into the ground, but rolls along impervious surfaces, picking up debris, fertilizer and other pollutants – is a major source of pollutants in the Chesapeake Bay. In 2012, the Maryland General Assembly passed a law that required larger jurisdictions to collect money and develop programs for stormwater management.
Legislation proposed would create a property fee of $7.80 per 500 square feet of impervious surface, calculated by the county’s Geographic Information Service (GIS) technology.
The owner of a home with 2,640 square feet of impervious surface would pay $39 per year (5 x $7.80). A larger home with, for instance, a longer, impervious driveway, totaling 12,540 square feet, would pay $195 (25 x $7.80).
The proposed legislation also includes one-time, partial reimbursement for improvements to stormwater treatment. Once upgrades are complete, homeowners may be eligible for an annual credit for as much as 50 percent off of the fee.
There are various ways to improve the permeability of residential areas, including detention and retention ponds, permeable driveways and the use of water-capturing devices such as rain barrels.
Homes built after more rigid stormwater guidelines were imposed, in 2002, will also eligible to receive a credit.
According to a statement released by the county, the fund is expected to collect $7 million in its first year with an annual reevaluation to ensure it can cover ongoing projects, which may include:
- Stream restoration
- Pond retrofits
- Bio swales
- Curb bump-outs
- Asphalt reduction
- Green roofs
- Maintenance
- Public awareness
This article has been corrected to indicate the fee is YEARLY.
As for neighboring states...they don't affect the water quality in the Little Patuxent and Patuxent Rivers. We do.
You saw the rezoning posters today? Acres and acres to be converted from forest and grassland to parking lots, pharmacies and restaurants. Ok, so they get to pay a fee although sound like they get a reduced fee. But, what for, now that the damage is done? How about requiring more green space in the plan? Oh no, that would reduce the taxes and fees.
Where is the study that "proves" the impact of non-permeable surfaces as compared to permeable surfaces. Even permeable surfaces only absorb so much water (if given enough time) - most of the water from a big thunderstorm will end up in the bay regardless of what kind of surface it falls on. I thought the biggest problem was farmland and their fertilzers and animal waste - most farmland is permeable but they have a lot of runoff regardless. It's hard not to suspect that we are being baffled with BS so the gov't can take more money from us. What's next solor refraction/absorption taxes?
http://www.newmichaelkorpurses.com/ michael kors outlet http://www.mk-michaelkoroutlets.com/ michael kors factory outlet http://www.gucci-shoesoutletfactory.com/ gucci outlet online http://www.northfaceeoutletonline.net/ north face clearance http://www.monsteroheadphone.net/ monster beats outlet http://www.coach-storesonline2013.com/ coach factory outlet online http://coachsfactoryoutletonline.webs.com/ coach factory outlet online http://mcoachoutlet.tumblr.com/ coach outlet online coach outlet usa