Parking in Ellicott City? There's an App for That
A new mobile application that shows available parking in the Historic District has gone online.
If you want to find parking in Ellicott City, County Executive Ken Ulman told a small crowd standing outside the Howard County Welcome Center Thursday morning, “We now have an app for that.”
The app – mobile phone application -- is Streetline’s Parker. It allows people to look up real-time information about available parking spaces in the Historic District.
Ulman said it addresses a problem that was brought to light as the result of a parking study carried out when he came into office.
"One of the biggest challenges that we face … is parking,” Ulman said. “More importantly, it’s frankly the perception of parking.”
For visitors to the Historic District, particularly those from out of town, “How would you know that right behind the Ellicott Mills Brewing Company, there are X number of spaces … you wouldn’t know that,” Ulman said.
The announcement that the parking system had gone online was a marked departure from previous discussions. Since the program was announced in August, some merchants have fought loudly against it – and the implementation of parking meters in the area.
Thursday’s announcement, however, was attended mostly by county officials and business owners, several of whom stepped up to the microphone to speak on behalf of the system.
Noting the difficulties that had befallen the Historic District in the past year – floods, power outages, an earthquake and the CSX train derailment – Ellicott City Business Association President and Wine Bin owner Dave Carne stressed the resilience of Main Street.
“In spite of all that this town is terrific,” he said. “As a business owner I am thrilled with the creative ingenuity that the county has but forward to make it a better and more attractive place to do business.”
Rumor Mill owner Matt Milani called Parker an “unbelievable tool,” that would “help guests come into town, spend more money, and enjoy their stay here.”
Ulman said the project wasn’t a “locked-in fixed plan written in stone,” and that its use as a data collecting tool would help the county determine when, if any, there really wasn’t available parking in the Historic District.
“So when people come to me and say ‘we need a free shuttle,’ or ‘we need a new garage,’ we’ll be able to look and say ‘you know what … absolutely’ or ‘no, there are spaces available.’”
Throughout the run-up to Parker going online, Director of Special Projects Steve Lafferty has been working closely with merchants and residents as a liaison to the administration.
“We have some terrific businesses here in Ellicott City that we hope will just grow and continue to thrive.”
Lafferty noted that there was still another phase in the parking program – paid parking on Main Street and Maryland Avenue.
Once the meters go online, after Jan. 1, people will be able to pay remotely for parking at the new, multi-space meters, which have already been installed.
Drivers will be able to pay for parking using a mobile device.
Anticipating a shift in parking rules, Lafferty said some merchants are finding ways to get “creative.”
“We’re going to pay for our customers’ parking,” Work.Play.Bark. owner Marc Lund said. Though he’s still working out the details, the ability to be able to pay remotely is one that he plans to take full advantage of on behalf of his customers.
In the meantime, Ulman also made an announcement that will come as no surprise to those who have been in town for holiday seasons past: parking will be free in the Historic District for the shopping season, from Nov. 22 – Jan. 1.
To use the Parker application, download it for your Android or iPhone.
Related:
- Bigger Problems Than Meters on Main Street
Peter Edelen
3:45 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012
I would recommend using for Midnight Madness. Impress your friends with how easily you find those hidden parking spots. Park like Ninja.
Sara Arditti
5:18 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012
This parking app is going to drain one million dollars out of our local economy over the next 4 years and put it straight into the pockets of two out-of-state corporations, Streetline Inc, of CA and Duncan Meters of WI. The most outrageous part of this program is that it was pushed through by the County Administration and a small group of business owners without any input from the majority of the business owners in the Historic District, and without making any effort to inform us until after it was a done deal, despite the fact that 65% of the business owners in The Historic District signed a petition opposing it. I for one have joined the ECBA and encourage all other business owners to do so to make sure this type of behind-the scenes dealing is not repeated.
For the sake of fairness, the paid parking hours should be extended until 11 pm so that the restaurants and bars can have their customers pay their fair share of the financial burden this program imposes. Parking is difficult mainly on weekend evenings. Daytime business like mine (Still Life Gallery) that operate when parking is plentiful are shouldering the burden while bars and restaurants get free parking for their customers in the evenings. I trust that the restauranteurs such as Matt from Rumor Mill, a strong advocate of this parking program, will show his sincerity by requesting that the paid parking hours be extended to allow his customers to pay their fair share for the benefits he believes it will provide.
Tony McGuffin
11:11 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012
Sara, I sure wish you'd give it a rest. You just moved to this town and have immediately taken such a negative and divisive approach to an issue that has long been the one persistent issue that has plagued Ellicott City. This parking plan may be or may not be the perfect solution, but I appreciate that the County Government has made the capital investment and tried to help. Why don't we wait and see how it works, before resuming the negative and misleading attacks?
john stephens
10:12 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
It seems the small number of business owners in favor do not have a dog in the hunt. This is an absurd "solution" to the "perception" of parking issues. The issues are very real, but they occur after the metered hours are in effect.
The comment by Ms Arditti is very relevant; does Tony even live or work here ?
Peter Edelen
10:59 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
I don't think it would be increased past 8pm if and when they expand the hours based on the statistics they gather over the next year. In any case, there will be a high percentage of residential turnaround as we start to feel the effect of getting home from work during the enforcement period and increased citations. They will need a new breed of residents who choose to live here.
Timmy Kaye
3:35 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012
tony said....i sure wish you'd give it a rest. i am in favor of that.
H.R. Pufnstuf
7:14 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012
"I'd much rather use an app than a mobile website."- no one ever
Assuming its the "Parker" app in the apple App Store I just took a look and the lack of parking it returned would keep me away from historic Ellicott City. Looks like there's about 20 available spots in the whole place as I type this.
Jack Lucas
7:13 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
Tony, here's the problem is that "old all knowing and I don't care" Ken, brother in law runs the CA company. Ken like Martin does things with out research or care of what people want or think. So like Sara, "I just moved here but yet I can think for myself" this will kill Old EC but Kenny will be gone so he won't care.
Sara Arditti
10:11 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
Hi Jack,
Welcome to EC! Thank you for "getting it". I would like to talk to you, please call me or stop by Still Life Fine Art Gallery, 8173 Main St (next to Johnny's Bistro) 410-461-1616, during business hours Wed- Sun 11-6 . Thank you.
Tony McGuffin
11:22 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
Jack, It's not about whether or not you can think for yourself, it's about whether you can frame an argument without resorting to making up lies about those you disagree with, without relying on ad hominem arguments to belittle them, and without making unsubstantiated assertions. Thank you for helping me make my points with your three examples.
Sara Arditti
10:38 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
Sara Arditti
10:30 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
Dear Tony McGuffin,
When you make accusatory statements such as the one above, you need to be clear and specific. I would like you to please tell me exactly what it was that I have said that was "misleading", and why you think it is so. I consider this a cowardly attack on my moral character, Tony, which you need to back up with your facts, figures, and sources, the way I do. I would also like for you come to my gallery with a list if questions and any documentation you would like to see. I will be happy to provide any facts and figures you like, straight from the Howard County Admin, the Purchasing Department, and Mr. Lafferty. I spent many, many hours over a couple of months, working diligently with an attorney who helped me to research and investigate all of this. There were indeed many questions raised. You have very little actual knowledge of the specifics of this case. As I have offered to you before: If you ever wish to learn and become informed. let me know and I will give you the thousands of pages of documents, facts, figures, and emails for you to pore over like I did, as well as people to talk to, and you can come to your own conclusions. You can then publish all your findings here on Patch, so everyone can see them.
It is interesting that ALL the other people to whom I made this offer to have not taken me up on it. They are afraid of seeing the truth.
Tony McGuffin
11:11 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012
Sara, Your false assertion that the contract went to Ken Ulman's college friend, is now further exaggerated in a lie which you characterize as evidence of Jack's "getting it." That says a lot about you. You have made many false claims and accusations, including numerous charges of corruption. Your petition, once touted as representing "a vast majority" even when you had only 60 signatures, compared to the over 130 businesses, would not survive scrutiny in any official capacity because, by my own personal experience in hearing your pitch to sign it, I know that it was misleadingly promoted, complete with the aforementioned false charges of corruption, and a claim that it would require an illegal hand-held apparatus while driving to operate, and specious financial claims. Furthermore, I question the judgment of a person who moves to a new town and immediately takes such a vitriolic, uncivil approach to an issue with absolutely no regard for the damage you might do to the established discourse in that community. I believe that your argument has been irresponsible, irrational, and hysterical. If you have an issue with the parking, make an argument about the parking rather than harmful, ill-conceived and unsubstantiated accusations. It is arrogant and delusional to claim that people don’t come to your shop because “they are afraid of seeing the truth.” I avoid your shop because I found you to be ill-informed, misleading, and extremely unpleasant on my first visit.
Sara Arditti
11:42 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
Peter-
Regarding your comment re residential parking- that's why you need to push for free resident parking permits which will allow you to park wherever and whenever for free.
I wish you success with your upcoming meeting with the County on residential parking issues. I hope the residents will be in control of this group, not the County, that it will be on the residents' terms, that YOU will be the ones generating the proposals to which the Administration will have to respond, not the other way around. Most of all, that you will not bend to their will under duress, and take the path of least resistance for the sake of not rocking the boat or potentially offending the powers that be, (as some people advocated to me!)
Timmy Kaye
1:11 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
Sara. Failed logic is a hallmark of yours. Restaurants Re open during the day. Id be willing to wager that even the smallest restaurants in town do more revenue on saturday day than you do in a week. So your logic is...lets screw everyones clientelle. Most retailers unlike yourself do not have bankerz hours. Perhaps if you stayed open lile malls and shopping centers do....youve gone from making pointz to being vindictive. Get over it. Its the law like it or not. Your are isolating yourself from everyone at this point and trying to screw the residents. Resident...remember who is trying to make you pay with your dollars. Avoid saras shop like the plague. I will
Sara Arditti
3:05 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
Tommy,
How is my advocating for the residents that they should be able to get FREE parking permits allowing them to park anywhere anytime for FREE an attempt to screw them? Talk about failed logic! And now that the suggestion has been made to have ALL customers pay their fair share, not just the daytime ones, you have turned on me. So in other words, you were in agreement only when it benefited your own interests, not the collective ones. Otherwise I cannot imagine why you think evening and night customers should not pay for parking like the daytime ones do, especially because, as you accurately pointed out, the restaurants do indeed make a lot more money than any of us daytime merchants do. So your logic is actually completely twisted.
Timmy Kaye
1:22 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
Sara youve gone from paid parking is bad to extend the hours is good. You are a walking contradiction
Sara Arditti
3:12 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
I am in favor of FAIRNESS! Now that this paid parking burden has been imposed on us, it should be shared EQUALLY. I'm sorry but your argument that somehow restaurant night customers should be exempt from paying for parking like daytime customers do is simply not justifiable. I am only asking they do the same thing my customers have to do- PAY to park, nothing more.
Timmy Kaye
1:25 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
But ill give you this...youve united even folks that agree and disagree with parking on one thing
Timmy Kaye
1:42 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
That said I still find it odd ecba is presented as supporting this.
Timmy Kaye
4:45 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
Sara it is shared equally. We are open during the day. What part of we have the same hours as yiu dont you get. Its not shared...its more revenue out of people pockets. So if our customer have to pay day and night and your pay during the day....how is that fair. Our customers do pay during the day. Your argument and your logic is flawed. Our day customers to have to paym. So if you think parking paid is bad by day....why is it good T night....silly
Timmy Kaye
4:46 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
Sara....so you wanna screw the customers. I get ya. Btw yiu had nothing to do with the residents getting possible free parking
Timmy Kaye
5:26 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
The point. .apparently goes way over your head. Paid parking encourages turnover. Retaurants want folks to stick around. Its an entirely different clientèle. The reasons were to help the retailers. So you wamt to screw the restaurants because you lost the argument. Brilliant. Almost as brilliant as your class action lawsuit.
Sara Arditti
5:50 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
Timmy Kaye:
Now you are raving...and incoherent too. What "class action lawsuit" are you referring to? I hope you have some documentation to back up this absurdity. But of course, none exists, so maybe you should have thought about that before you make wild baseless statements.
You must feel extremely threatened by my proposal to be making up lies like this, and to feel the need to conduct your little smear campaign, (as a matter of fact there are several other business owners in favor of ALL customers paying their fair share) but I say- just continue...I for one find it very amusing to watch you self- destruct! Keep on keeping on!
Everyone is watching you now to see your evidence of a so-called "class action lawsuit", so bring it on! I'm very curious to see what you come up with. Please include the following info: when and where it was filed, who the "class" is, how many people are in it, who is being sued, what the claim is, what remedies we are demanding, who the law firm is, and when and where the hearing will take place....(other than in your imagination.) After all, this is all a matter of public record, so you can go and find it, and please let us all know when you do, OK?
Timmy Kaye
3:29 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012
everyone is watching as you type. its been quote the entertainment as the community read aloud your posts to great amusement. keep it coming.
Timmy Kaye
6:16 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
You bruoght up the lawsuit in front of witnesses. Nice try. We are enjoying you bury yourself
Timmy Kaye
6:20 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
You bruoght up the lawsuit in front of witnesses. Nice try. We are enjoying you bury yourself. Your reaction is all we need. Lol
Sara Arditti
7:02 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
Timmy,
So according to you, "bringing it up" is the same as actually filing, right? Very logical, good job!
You are obviously lacking in the area of law and its terminology, so I will explain the FACTS:
I did in fact bring up and discuss the possibility of an EMERGENCY INJUNCTION shortly before the installation of the sensors in order to halt the project. I did not file for one. (or any other kind of legal action)
A class action lawsuit would not have been the thing to do, as it takes way too long, is way too expensive, and not really relevant to this type of situation.
Good try, young man, hope you can come up with a better lie next time! Bring it on. I love this kind of stuff, can't you tell? I love shooting down liars, it's a great feeling.
Timmy Kaye
3:27 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012
please reference where i said you filed anything. until such time. you are the one creating falsehoods. i will say we are all enjoying you burying yourself in the community.
Timmy Kaye
3:28 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012
btw i am 44 years old and have been a business owner in this neighborhood for 15 years. if you'd like to compare resumes, academic backrounds and experinece in the community at anytime, id be glad to do so.
Timmy Kaye
7:08 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
I didnt say you did it drama queen. Please relay where I saod you did itm. I said it was a brilliant idea in sarcasm. But thanks for admitting you were pursuing it. I didnt lie. I simply sa8d it was a brilliant thought. Hows busijess btw.. .
Peter Edelen
8:03 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
LOL
Sara Arditti
11:01 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
Well, Timmy, after that last comment, I am literally speechless, I rest my case!
Timmy Kaye
3:26 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012
you should be spechless and it would do us all a great favor if you remained so. that said you were the one who brought up, self admittedly, a lawsuit. we all dismissed it. what i said, in context, not that context means a thing to you...is "Almost as brilliant as your class action lawsuit." in referecen to an idea. noone claimed you filed anything. you'd need more than one group to do so and you didnt have the support to do so. i never claimed, as you deceptively have claimed...you filed a lawsuit. you are lost. you have successfully got everyone to agree on one thing. noone wants you to be the voice of any group. the residents, as you can see are laughing. and even those opposed and for the parking are making it clear they dont want you as an ally. you have choices. i'd suggest the COMPLETE laco of support for any of your ideas would be an indication, that you should remain....speechless.
Timmy Kaye
3:33 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012
btw you've been blocked from posting on the ellicott mills forum for a reason. perhaps one should take a hint.
Sara Arditti
8:19 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012
Timmy,
You know, it' really kind of flattering that you care SO much about what I say and do that you are willing to stay up half the night ( it was about 4:00 am when you last posted) in order to try to provoke a response from me. Well, here it is, young man:
Speak to the wall, I care not what you say or think. Go get some sleep, and don't feel so threatened by me.
Gayle Charlene Killen
9:35 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012
I love Mr. Lund's idea (Work.Play.Bark) of paying for his customer parking!
Sara Arditti
11:38 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012
Tony,
I never, not ever, once said that the contract went to Ken Ulman's college friend; that is a lie. I have no evidence for this, and without clear evidence this would not be something I would consider bringing up. I challenge you to show when and where I ever said this. I actually told other people who were making this claim that it could not substantiated.
You have still not bothered to take me up on my offer to look at the documentation and the facts. You have no real idea what is in it. Until you do, you have no right to make judgements about it. The fact that you feel the need to resort to personal attacks about how "extremely unpleasant" you find me indicates you know you are on very shaky ground.
Corrections to your misinformation: According to Steve Lafferty, there are 100 business. 65 of them signed the petition, not 60 as you misstated. The petition is here for you to count them, as are the other documents for your inspection. Until you have looked at all of the documents and information, which were obtained from the County, you have no right to make judgements and accusations simply because you don't like me, or the idea that there may have been something amiss. It's easy to shoot the messenger, which is what you are attempting to do.
The fact is that any "sole bidder" procurement contract raises red flags that should be reviewed. That is part of the American Democratic process, it is our right as citizens to hold our elected representatives responsible.
Tony McGuffin
2:06 pm on Saturday, November 17, 2012
Sara, (1) please recall more accurately that you told me personally that Ulman was engaged in cronyism and corruption (2) you should read my comments more carefully (3) It was not a "sole bidder procurement procedure (4) Just because someone didn't get "facts" from you does not mean they are ill-informed, in fact the contrary seems to be true.
Saying that I find you unpleasant is not a personal attack, just my opinion based on observation and my experience with you. But if making personal attacks indicates shaky ground - how are you still standing?!? As for your other post, re: your invitation - it may surprise you that likely no one is afraid of you or intimidated by you, but just annoyed with you for your destructive approach to a community issue. I am not going to argue with you anymore, and I expect you will draw some erroneous conclusion from that, but I just think it's a waste of time. While I've been concerned about your negative effect on the dialogue between the community and the government, I imagine that by now everyone sees the problem is isolated to mostly just one person, so I hope others look at facts before following your lead, and I'll have to be satisfied with that. I believe that your approach has been counter productive in its vitriol and divisiveness, which is very unfortunate for us all and seems a strange way to introduce yourself to a new neighborhood.
Sara Arditti
12:13 pm on Saturday, November 17, 2012
An Open Invitation to The Community:
In good faith, at this Holiday season, I would like to invite everyone who has a gripe with me, or how I have handled the parking situation, to please come to my business, Still Life Gallery, 8173 Main St and have an actual face-to face discussion, a civil discourse. Especially if you really hate me, and perhaps have said mean and insulting things, I welcome and encourage you to come on over. You may think this is odd, but it is all too easy to hide behind the safety of written word in this type of forum. It should not be an easy substitute for actual human interaction. We are open Wed- Sun 11:00 am-6:00pm. I am really quite friendly, enjoy a good laugh, am not likely to bite, and am not nearly as scary as some have described.
Sara Arditti
4:11 pm on Saturday, November 17, 2012
Tony,
There was in fact a "sole bidder". You keep pretending this is not true. Streetline was the one and only company that bid on this project and was awarded a contract that gives them up to $833,000 in the first four years. You may come to my gallery and look at the documents stating these facts, as well as the contract itself, from Darla Herbold, Head of the Howard County Purchasing Dept.
By the way Tony, exactly how many of the original documents, including the Streetline contract, the Request for Proposal put out by the County in January 2012, the 2009 Desman Study, the parking program's Projected Revenue chart, and the letters answering my Public Information requests from the Howard County Purchasing Dept have you read personally with your own eyes?
I want you to make an accurate count, and let everyone know.
To date you have refused all offers to see these things for yourself; why is that? Why do you keep pretending you know what they say when you have not bothered to look at them?
These are not "facts from me" as you like to pretend, but from the Howard County Admin.
Why do you refuse to understand this?
Better yet, email Steve Lafferty and ask him whether or not Streetline was the only company that bid, and how much they are getting out of it; then let everyone know what YOU found out. Then you'd be assured of the accuracy of this. I'm sure you'd be curious to see what they tell you, aren't you?
Bill Pastino
9:54 pm on Saturday, November 17, 2012
Wow such love in here. Sara it was a sole bider but what Tony said was "It was not a "sole bidder procurement procedure" The bid was open to others only 1 sent a qualified bid. So what Tony said was correct. You did mention a lawsuit not sure if it was a class action or not. You are new to this town so you kinda behind the 8 ball about the history of the goings on. I know you wanted to help unite the people of the town against this back door parking fiasco. Well the fight is over it is the law. Please realize this because all you are doing now is causing problems and dividing the town. If this is what you want then keep posting, if not then stop posting and put your time into your business. Time to move on....
Timmy Kaye
1:32 am on Sunday, November 18, 2012
Sara. Friday I worked from ten am until 3 am. I got home late. Im not staying up for you. You are recreation. ...like a cat pawing a mouse back and forth. Because my business actually has customers...indont have all day to post on the internet...make signs for picketing...try to grt class action lawsuits together...petition the county for free parking for myself....etc etc etc.
Sara Arditti
11:27 am on Sunday, November 18, 2012
Another lie Timmy- "petitioned the county for free parking for myself" Let it be noted for the record this is a lie.
Timmy Kaye
2:07 am on Sunday, November 18, 2012
Gayle. Restaurants work kn very small margins. You are talking about tens of thousands of dollars. You are literally advocating laying people off.
Gayle Charlene Killen
1:03 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012
Sorry, I didn't mean to suggest that all businesses pay for their customer parking. I just like that Work.Play.Bark is doing so. I imagine it would cost hundreds of dollars a day for a restaurant to pay for it's customer parking, where a smaller biz might put out $20 on the busiest day of the year. It seems like it might be a good strategy for small biz, but not so applicable for a larger clientele base. I guess we'll see how it works out for Mr. Lund.
And I think you're using the term "literally" figuratively. I just got laid off, among thousands of US contractors losing their jobs. I don't understand why you would suggest such a thing.
james earl jones
10:43 am on Sunday, November 18, 2012
free parking at the courthouse!!! all you have to do is walk down the street to get to work or walk up the street to go home. laziness is not a reason for reform.
MD Harley Riders
9:46 am on Monday, December 31, 2012
If a vehicle's time has expired but it's still in the space does the space show available or not available? Does the app monitor actual occupied space or just the parking meter paid status?
I guess this could be a decent option to help look for parking but probably not a guarentee you'll find one.
Peter Edelen
10:17 am on Monday, December 31, 2012
space availability for the app is determined by sensors, not the meters being paid or not. there are sensors in the free spots too. meter paid status and amount of time a space is taken will be monitored by parking enforcement.
it tells you in general where the spots are, by lots, Maryland Ave, and Main Street segmented by blocks. the best bet is to go in the direction of where it shows 4+ spots. if you zoom out on the app, it shows # of spots available per lot and street section.
john stephens
12:41 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013
has anyone, ANYONE ???? actually used this app ? Doesn't seem worth the money or the hassle in this particular area.