patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Movement to Change School Times Lands in Howard County

A local father says high school students are sleep deprived.

 

Can you remember a time when you were sleep deprived? Maybe you couldn’t figure out why your house key wouldn’t start the car, or you misspelled your boss’s name?

“Any adult can remember a time when we were sleep deprived,” Mark Donovan said. “ We know how it affected us. Why do we not think that it affects our kids the same way?”

In fact, said Donovan, a clinical therapist based in Columbia, it does. Donovan has joined a growing movement to push back the start times of high school in an attempt to fix the “chronic sleep deprivation” that many say is evident in teenagers.

He has started the Howard County chapter of StartSchoolLater, a national coalition “concerned that children and teenagers required to start the school [day] too early in the morning face unnecessary challenges.” 

The group is advocating for high schools to start, at the earliest, at 8 a.m. and has a petition circulating online.

Donovan has met with members of the Howard County Board of Education and the Howard County Public School System (HCPSS) as they begin a study into “the opening time of schools and the impact that an early opening has on the health and well-being of school students.”  

HCPSS is in the earliest stages of a study to determine whether it will change start times; specifically, according to spokesperson Rebecca Amani-Dove, whether elementary schools should start first and high schools last.

The first part of the study is the cost feasibility and impact analysis, which will address the questions posed by those skeptical of changing school start times, including: child care, athletics programs, and, what Amani-Dove called one of the biggest issues: transportation. 

As for the cost analysis, she said, “If we find it’s too costly or not feasible, we won’t move on to the second phase.”

If changing start times is financially viable, however, HCPSS will go on to the second step, which will include surveys of stakeholders, including students, parents, teachers and local businesses.

The study, Amani-Dove said, will likely take about a year and any approved changes would not go into effect until, at the earliest, the 2014/2015 school year.

'Part of being an adult'

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, citing the National Sleep Foundation, says teenagers need 8.5 – 9.25 hours of sleep.

In Howard County, high schools begin at 7:25 a.m.; if a student needed one hour to get ready before school, that student would need to be in bed by 10 p.m.

Some people who are not in favor of changing start times say parents should be able to get their kids in bed by then. “They have to learn that’s what after high school is,” Verna Schlein wrote on Ellicott City Patch’s Facebook page. “Getting up early and going to work … budgeting sleep, school homework and playtime is part of being an adult.

“We know they are adults because they keep telling us they are.”

Just being in bed by 10 p.m. isn’t enough, Donovan said. 

“You can send your teen to bed at 10, but they won’t sleep,” he said, citing research that concludes teenagers are on different sleep cycles.

According to Contemporary Pediatrics (citing the journal Neuroscience Letters), a change in circadian rhythms of teenagers – the biological clock that dictates when animals sleep and wake – means teenagers fall asleep later than their younger siblings or parents.

Teenagers, according to the article, have a biologically-rooted “‘Night owl’ tendency to stay up late.”

'Where there's a will, there's a way'

Another argument against pushing back the start times for high school deals with child-care.

“Many high schoolers watch their younger siblings,” Jane Nicholson Holcomb wrote. If the teenagers got out of school later, “Parents would then have the cost of daycare, which they may not be able to afford.”

Others express concern that extra curricular activities would suffer. “What would happen to high school sports and teens that have jobs?” Lisa Barnard Brown wrote. “Early start is fine in my house!”

Of course, money is always a concern. Pushing back the high school start times could mean more buses are necessary as high schoolers could now be on the road the same time as middle school and even elementary school students. 

To this, says Maribel Ibrahim, a Patch blogger and the Anne Arundel County-based founder of the national StartSchoolLater organization, there is no single answer, but, she said, “Where there’s a will, there’s a way. The community can adjust.”

People in communities across the country have made these changes, she said, noting a page on the SchoolStartLater website with examples of different approaches to pushing back school times - some at-cost, some for free.

'Everything's not OK'

In many cases, Ibrahim said, students don’t even know they’re sleep deprived and giving them a little more productive sleep can lead to a big difference. “Students will actually be more alert and awake,” she said, “They’ll spend less time working on their homework. They’re more efficient -- not forgetting, not drowsy, not going home and taking a nap.” 

Although they will get out of school later, she said, they may be done with the day’s work earlier. 

“What bothers me most as a father,” said Donovan, who has a 6th and 8th grader at home, “Is that the majority of kids get out at 2:10. They are raising themselves until both parents get home.” 

It would be nice to think they’re going home to do their homework, he said, but that’s not the case with all teens. “They’re smoking pot, having sex … doing things they shouldn’t be doing.” 

“Were limping along saying everything’s OK,” Ibrahim said, “But everything’s not OK.”

Related:

School Start Times Under Review for Howard County Schools

How Early is Too Early to Head to Class?

POLL: Should Howard County Schools Start Later?

This article has been updated to include more recent guidelines from the CDC. 

Related Topics: School start times, SchoolStartLater, howard county public schools, and teenagers and sleep

Anita

8:12 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Having raised 3 teenagers, I truly believe that the problem is that they go to bed too late. They want to stay up texting their friends and being on the computer. My kids played sports and did their homework and unless there were extenuating circumstances, they were in bed by 11. Getting up at 6:15 gave then the 7 hours they needed. If you go to bed late all the time you are resetting the body clock.

Reply

Mark Donovan

8:30 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Anita, I agree that we as parents need to limit texting, tv, an PC (screen time) before bed time. However, a bigger problem is that not only do our teens need 9 hours of sleep a night, their body rhythm or circadian rhythm changes as well. Studies show most teens are not able to fall asleep or get productive sleep until 11:00pm. If our kids are up at 6:00 to catch the bus, that is only 7 hours of sleep, not the 9 they need. Check out this journal article from the JAMA Pediatrics:

http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=383436#qundefined

This study recommends our teens not wake up until 8:00 - starting school closer to 9:00. The science is very comprehensive. It's not the bed time, its the start time.

Reply
Comment_arrow

AML

10:00 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Where are your kids getting POT from and having sex?

mare

10:18 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

I wonder how, not so many years ago, millions of children not only made it through high school, but did so with better attitudes and better grades than the teenagers of today. A later start time would have one big advantage. I'd be safer walking in the early morning hours. Their disregard for others is appalling. Sad to say, but the parents are just as bad. I continue to have hip problems because of being run off the road into a ditch while walking. And no, we do not have sidewalks or street lights. It's about time people started thinking about someone other than themselves.

Reply

woodbine5

12:39 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

half the support for start times deals with child care for kids. What ever happened to parents raising their own kids. If parents were there when kids went to school AND were home when they got home then the drug/sex issues would be minimized, child care issues non existant, and perhaps then parents could minimize computer/text interactions so the kids could get to bed at a reasonable time. .

Reply

Elle

2:21 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

What difference does anyone think this will make? High school kids will just stay up later and still be sleep deprived. How about parents, being parents and making them go to bed and not be out late on school nights?

Reply

NoPower

3:22 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Please, how about parents being parents and making sure their kids go to bed at a decent time?
Generations have gone and survived going to school early. The difference is that the inmates are now running the asylum .
I see kids out and about during the week at midnight. Where are the parents?
These last two or three generations have become soft and everything is somebody else's flat and never their own.

Reply

Brook Hubbard

3:52 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Did either of you two listen to the remark that going to bed earlier wouldn't help? It's a physiological issue, not a social one. Teenager sleep cycles are geared to not start until 11 p.m.; putting them to bed at 10 p.m. or earlier does nothing but leave a bored teenager sitting in their room for an hour or more.

There is no evidence for an average start time for public schools throughout the 20th century. We can use all the anecdotes we want, but until we compile information from a significant and varied U.S. population, you cannot say that generations have been at the current time. (My own memory of high school says school started at 8:15 a.m., which is still later than current start times.)

Second, it is fallacy to make claims that earlier start times in the past worked fine without looking at other sociocultural factors. Even if an average start time was "early", there were plenty of other factors. Family life, attendance, requirements, safety, and overall educational culture were far different in the mid- to early-20th century than they are today.

The fact remains, from a scientific viewpoint, that teenagers need a later school start time. Their sleep cycles don't start until well after 10 p.m. and they need 8 to 9 hours of sleep for healthy development. That means their wake time should be between 7 a.m. and 8 a.m... which means current school start times are way too early (especially when they need an hour or more to get ready and there).

Reply

Elle

4:09 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

How about night school? Do you think a 1/2 hour start time would be any different? How about not letting them play computer games all night? When I was a teenager, I read a book until I was drowsy enough to turn off the lights and go to sleep. They can't sleep because they're on the computer all night, playing games and socializing. Or they're just out with friends, doing what? They don't do anything to wear them out and make them tired enough to go to bed. My hs started at 7:30am. I was out the door every morning at 7 for a brisk walk to school. And just the luck, we'll get their start time later and they'll be whining and complaining about having to stay in school longer in the day. You know i"m right! :)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brook Hubbard

6:20 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

So, you're saying because YOU were fine (or so you claim)... we should ignore all of the research studies out there saying a later school time is recommended (for the reasons above)?

Comment_arrow

Elle

9:42 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Let's not get personal and be rude. I see you totally ignored the part of my rant where these kids are spending too much time at night being on the internet and do nothing that actually tires them out.

Comment_arrow

Brook Hubbard

10:56 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

And you ignored the part where that wasn't even the topic at hand. We're not discussing children that stay out (or up) all night, we're discussing your average teenager who goes to bed at 10 p.m. and doesn't drift off until 11 p.m. to Midnight. That has nothing to do with spending too much time on the internet or doing things to tire one's self out... it is simple biology.

Comment_arrow

Polly

5:32 am on Friday, February 15, 2013

@Brook Hubbard
You are absolutely right. I remember high school in the early 70's and the early start time. I didn't have a PC, cell phone etc., and yet still could not fall asleep before 11PM. I would just lay in bed doing nothing but waiting for sleep to come. And then on the weekend I could sleep until noon (if allowed to do so) just to play catch up.

Thirty years later I watched my high schooler go through the same thing. He didn't not have a pc in his room, nor a cell phone. He would complain often about having to go to be at 10 PM to only just lay there doing nothing for more than an hour. Kind of hard to fall asleep when you body is all keyed up. It's an undisputable fact, they just can't fall asleep early. Also, I used to fall asleep often in the most boring classes. Not sure I learned much in that topic. Go into any high school and see how many heads are down on their desks or ask a teacher.

Elizabeth

6:08 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

These kids are wusses. No time change. It prepares them for the real work world.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brook Hubbard

6:21 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

You mean the world where the majority of jobs are 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.?

Comment_arrow

Elle

9:43 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Who works 9 - 5 anymore? Hours are getting longer and we're turning these kids into weak adults.

Comment_arrow

Brook Hubbard

11:00 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Plenty of people work 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., or a close variant there-of. The point remains, many of us have children who get up for school before we do. Claiming that getting up early "prepares them for the real work world" is not based in anything factual or logical.

Elizabeth

12:05 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013

Gees, I worked for the corporate world in an office. The 3 jobs I had started at 8am and ended 4:30pm or 5pm. Sorry Brook, it does prepare them and it is logical. My husband whose an Engineer works from 8am to 7pm. My construction workers work from 7:30am to 4pm. My sister a nurse works from 8am to 6pm. Farmers work from 5am to 5pm or until dark. Gees, most jobs do work during the day. Yes, some jobs have other shifts, but I am sure the marjority is during the day. Kids need to work out their sleep schedules to what is required of them. These school hours were good enough for me in the 1970s and 1980s, they are good enough for them now. They need to stop goofing off and be more serious on their bedtimes. Stop the whining!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brook Hubbard

5:46 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013

Your anecdotes are just that... anecdotes. They are not indicative of the average work hours across the country. You cannot apply what you went through to the situation; that is a logical fallacy. If we were to go buy my work schedules, then children should prepare themselves for a 9-5, 6-2, 2-10, 10-6, 7-4, and random times from an on-call position. There is a reason "9 to 5" is part of our everyday vocabulary, and that is because it was (and is) the most common work schedule.

No one is whining. We are presenting SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE that later school times will help our children develop more healthily and prevent negative behavioral consequences. You are the one who is ignoring said evidence and claiming that our children are "wusses" and just "goofing off". Do you have anything beside anecdotes and personal opinion to support your argument?

Comment_arrow

Terri McCulley Hicks

12:15 am on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Brook likes to use the word "ANECDOTES" alot while he attacks people.

Comment_arrow

Brook Hubbard

8:37 am on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

And you like to claim that disproving an anecdote because there is no supporting evidence is an "attack". Are you that insecure about your stance that any time someone criticizes it you get upset?

NoPower

6:45 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013

There should be more reports on parents NOT parenting and kids running around at night instead of doing homework or going to bed early.
It's simple no need for wasting money on reports. You have a child make sure they are in bed by 9a. See simple! No money wasted.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brook Hubbard

8:12 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013

Again, did you not read the part where putting a teenager to bed early does NOTHING for them because of their physiology? Teenager circadian rhythms create a natural sleep cycle that does not allow them to enter sleep until well after 10 p.m. How many more times must that be reiterated before people recognize this scientific fact?

Comment_arrow

Elle

8:37 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013

That's ridiculous. They can't fall asleep because they come home from school and do nothing but sit around and watch tv or play on the computer. They do nothing to tire them out. If they did, they would have no trouble falling asleep at night. We need to stop babying these kids. It won't help them in the long run.

Comment_arrow

Brook Hubbard

8:47 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013

Again, as with NoPower, you have been presented with scientific fact. You have been presented with the testimonial of an expert in this field. Your refusal to accept this says more for your state of mind than any of these children.

Comment_arrow

Elle

9:29 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013

Again, you resort to being rude and trying to cut people down for their opinions. To you, its your way or no way. Well good luck with that :)

Comment_arrow

Brook Hubbard

9:41 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013

I "cut people down" for choosing ~opinion~ over ~fact~.

How else should it be? Should everyone just ignore science in lieu of personal viewpoints?

Comment_arrow

Elle

12:15 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

How else should it be? Really? I'll tell you how it should be......you should be a grown up and act like one. We are all expressing our opinions and you should be respectful of that.

Comment_arrow

Brook Hubbard

2:20 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts." - Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan

I did not post solely opinion, but scientific fact. You said people should act like grown ups? When a mature person has an opinion, but is confronted by evidence to the contrary, they do not ignore the evidence... they adjust their opinion.

Comment_arrow

Polly

5:43 am on Friday, February 15, 2013

@NoPower - seriously? are all kids out running the streets instead of being home? I would bet they are in a small minority. I was a very involved parent and for you to asssume otherwise is insulting.

@Elle - There's one in every bunch they say. Tag. Your it. You are certainly entitled to your opinion but when it lies in the face of scientic facts it falls short. When my son was in high school he played baseball year round and no matter how hard he played he still wasn't falling asleep before 11PM most nights. You are just being obstinate like a spoiled child. SMH

Comment_arrow

Elle

2:04 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

@Polly......wow......you're just as rude as Brook. Obviously no one ever taught you any manners.

Comment_arrow

Polly

9:29 am on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

@Elle
Nope not rude at all, I stated my opinion based on personal experience as very involved parent and former high shooler and scientific facts in the face of your obsurdity. Me thinks you are really just a troll looking to incite a riot. Come on, I've taken on far more intelligent in my lifetime and lived to tell about it.

Comment_arrow

Elle

9:34 am on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

@polly.....you proved my point. done with you and won't respond to your pettiness anymore. lol

Comment_arrow

Polly

10:20 am on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

@Elle
First, the fact that you signed the petition for later start times only proves that will all your moaning and groaning, bitching and complaining shows what a true hypocrite you are.

You insulted most parents for allegedly not being involved, and high schooler's who either run the streets all night or are playing video games and other computer stuff. You proved Brook and I corrected. So therefore, you are yet another meaningless, useless troll, now toddle along and let us big kids fight this battle.

Comment_arrow

Elle

12:26 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

@Polly......please learn to read. Where did I insult parents? And get out of the gutter. Why do you feel the need to resort to name calling on a message board? Oh and btw, its true.....high school kids DO stay up too late socializing on the computer, whether its a game or just a chat room. If they would open a book and just read in bed, they would get drowsy and fall asleep faster. Now try to be nicer and leave the potty mouth out of this .

Terra Ziporyn Snider, Ph.D.

7:39 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013

Obviously crack of dawn school hours aren't the only cause of teen sleep deprivation, but they play a major role in it and - unlike the many other factors - are ones we can change overnight with proven results, including more sleep per night (see http://www.startschoollater.net/myths-and-misconceptions.html).

The move to extremely early school hours - which began only about 30 years ago, mainly to save $ on buses - was a mistake, something we did before we knew much about teen sleep patterns and needs. And when you consider the compelling and consistent research now out there on the impact of these early hours on health, safety, school performance, equity, and even long-term economic prospects, you have to ask why people are so defensive about the value in sending teens to school from 7 am - 2 pm.

Asking as this petition (http://signon.org/sign/changing-howard-county) does that no child be required by law to be in class before 8 am is hardly radical. These teens are still children, with growing brains and bodies, and comparing them to adults, many of whom have some degree of control over their work hours, is pointless; it’s like saying infants shouldn’t nap so they can get ready for fifth grade. Just because we've done something one way doesn't mean it's necessarily the only or a desirable way to do things (we also thought seatbelts and bike helmets were for "wusses"). - Terra Ziporyn Snider, PhD, Executive Director, Start School Later

Reply

NoPower

8:22 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013

Physiology my foot. All these new fancy words and studies. We have survived going to school early for decades.
The new cream puffs with the non parenting parents need to learn that when you leave school, college, or wherever they end up, they are going to have to get up early to go to work!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brook Hubbard

8:31 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013

You have been presented with scientific fact. You have been presented with the testimonial of an expert in this field. You have been told how, prior to the 1980s, school start times were not early.

The fact that you continue to ignore that, spout unsupported and uneducated opinion, and hide behind an anonymous screen name, means you are either an Internet Troll or incapable of logical discourse. Either way, there is no reason to talk to someone like you.

Comment_arrow

Polly

5:48 am on Friday, February 15, 2013

I was very much involved with my son throughout his life and it's rude and insulting that because it wasn't physiologically possible for either him or I (when in HS) to fall asleep earlier that you refer to him as a "cream puff" and me "non parenting parent".
Do you realize the more you and Elle keep posting the dumber you sound?

Comment_arrow

Elle

9:12 am on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

@Polly. Didn't anyone ever teach you manners? sticks and stones Polly. lol

Mom '84

10:28 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013

IF the system would just let the parents worry about their kids & not force this study or that finding down our throats, I'm sure we're more than capable of handling. How many times does society change what they are doing to find out that the study they are touting actually isn't accurate or wasn't performed in a truly scientific manner. I started school at 7:20am and had no issues with it and that was over 30 years go. I start work at 6:30am an hour from my home so I can actually be at home monitoring and parenting my children when they are home from high school. The comment about kids being allowed too much TV, Computer, Cell phones it spot on. Be a parent! The school system should spend their time and our money worrying about the teachers they have in the system who are terrible, don't teach, don't discipline unruly kids and figure out how to get them out!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brook Hubbard

11:49 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013

Again, your anecdote does not cancel science itself. Especially when I can bring up anecdotes of my own. I just checked with four people, two who went to school in the 90's and two who went to school in the 60's. The start times I received? 8:00, 8:00, 8:15, and 9:00.

So, since we have conflicting anecdotes... who is right? Your argument, because you say so and think science should stay out of it? Or my argument, because I say so and have the backing of actual sleep studies?

Dolores Skowronek

12:37 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

Good policies are based on good information. Mr. Hubbard is right. Your district leaders would be wise to acknowledge the science behind this issue. The evidence regarding the consequences of adolescent sleep loss and early high school start times is overwhelming: http://startschoollater.pbworks.com/w/page/60413030/Entire%20Reference%20List

Reply

Aaron Brager

2:07 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

Sleep is important for physical growth (height), neuron growth in the brain, long-term memory storage, and general well-being. As a person who was in high school not all that long ago - class of 2000 I can give some insight about my experiences and why I would advocate for later school starts. I was involved in school sports (wrestling), socializing both on the net and in real-life, and - yes I did work when I was old enough to do so. It is quite a bit to juggle when you always feel as if you don't have enough sleep nor do you have much experience (or discipline) to perform these tasks with consistent efficiency. When you are a teenager school is important, but not just for learning - it is a catalyst for socializing, daydreaming, confronting identity issues, feeling like you belong and finding out that basically you are ill-prepared for what may come afterward whether it be college, trade school, or the working world. The energy it takes for psychosocial and physiological development during that period is unmatched the rest of your life. Ask any teenager and the majority will tell you they need more sleep and more than anyone else at any time. So starting school a little later to get perhaps even just one more hour can possibly make all the difference in the world. Parents could be there more or you can discourage "undesirable behaviors", but that really is not the bottom line. Opinions about what is right or wrong have nothing to do with the physiological needs of kids.

Reply

Maribel Ibrahim

3:23 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

Nicely put, Aaron Brager!
I can certainly appreciate the dialogue on this article. I wanted to remind our readers about a few facts that do need to be considered.
Early school start times are a recent phenomena. These early (before 8am) school start times only started happening in the late 1960's, in direct response to saving money on bus runs to our increasingly large and centralized school systems. Sleep research wasn't even in existence then because no one expected people to operate under less than 6 hours of sleep. Now, however, we are finding that it is not just Johnny "being lazy and irresponsible". Poor Johnny is now expected to go to school before the recycling is taken out, travel in dark and unsafe roads, put in a day in school, practice a sport for 2-3 hours a day, work a part time job and have more "well rounded" experience in other extra curricular pursuits. Well intentioned students are far from lazy and have a constant demand to produce and yet they are not given the 9 hours, yes 9 HOURS of sleep that their growing bodies need.

The idea that "we've always done it this way" is completely untrue. For more myths and misconceptions about later school start times, I urge you to read the link that Terra already shared above: http://startschoollater.net/myths-and-misconceptions.html

Reply

Julia McCready

11:07 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013

I'd just like to commend Brook for sticking to the facts. Adolescent body clocks are different than young children or adults AND start times did not used to be so early.

Reply

Dr. Dwyer

9:31 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

I'd love to recommend this change in policy to Baltimore Public Schools as well. I teach/tutor and kids aren't paying attention because they can't even keep their eyes open. These kids are not just running around at night either; they are given mounds of homework to do every evening, chores, showers/dinner, and hopefully some downtime to socialize/play/relax. On the weekends they sleep past 12:00 p.m. These kids need more sleep!

Reply

honey

10:32 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

I think before we rely on a few sources, get research that opposes this Scientific evidence. One person brings evidence to support his wants, there is evidence to oppose.
When you change time, I don't think people are considering that less students are able to participate in after school programs.
Seems like we are catering to a few who found research to favour their view. Anyone can find research today to support anything.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brook Hubbard

10:42 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

Then please, provide peer-reviewed or professional evidence that contradicts the studies and testimonials provided here.

The problem I perceive is that most people seem more concerned with the inconveniences or social ramifications, such as conflicts with extracurricular activities. Do these rate higher than the psychological and physiological development of our children? Is it more important to guarantee better core education or increased elective or similar education?

We need to determine what long-term social effects there are from changing schedules and, if they exist, if they are a higher priority than the proven developmental effects.

Comment_arrow

Mark Donovan

11:23 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

Hello honey,
I challenge you to find research that shows that it is harmful to move school to a later time. Not opinions, but research that shows a benefit to keeping school early.

Comment_arrow

Dolores Skowronek

2:29 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

Hello honey, I am a professional health science librarian. I am well educated and understand how to find and interpret the research literature. I promise you that I have NEVER found even one credible published research study showing that adolescents benefit from early high school start times or adolescent sleep loss. Absolutely none. Being a librarian, I can also tell you that it is absolutely NOT true that you can find research to support any side of an argument. Here is a bibliography that I compiled with 171 individual citations taken primarily from the biomedical or education research literature. This is the good stuff: http://startschoollater.pbworks.com/w/page/60413030/Entire%20Reference%20List

Mark Donovan

12:12 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

I hope anyone who agrees with the idea that school should start later will sign the Howard County Petition at: http://tinyurl.com/sslhoco Then join us on Facebook at: https://www.facebook.com/groups/136868756472888/

Reply

woodbine5

2:04 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

I totally support a later start time especially for my two high schoolers. I am also a substitute teacher in the county and see tired, tired kids in class. HOWEVER I think the entire school process needs to be examined NOT JUST start times. If we are truely interested in brain development, biological rhythms, ect then we need to look at the whole package not just individual components and consider "unintended consequences". For example, if we adjust start times just an hour later, yet homework and sports practices continue unadjusted, then all we are doing is pushing homework until midnight from 11pm (my kids have on average 4 hours plus a nite) and sleep is still deprived. Does a kid really need 25 math problems for homework or will they still learn with only 10? If they have to read 3 chapters enough what is going on in the classroom that prevents them from doing it there, where it should be done. Many studies (since we are relying on studies in this on line discuss) show homework does little if nothing to support learning, but the kids still get it assigned to them (just ask a teacher why they assign so much, most often you will get an answer like "i just think the kids need it?) Let's look at the whole package before we invest great sums of money before looking at all the consequences. Later start times, combined with more effective teaching methods, AND updated data based homework strategies can all lead to kids who learn more, and more effectively.

Reply

Dr. Dwyer

2:25 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

I always thought that elementary, junior high and high school start times were scattered because of bus availability. Would switching the start times between elem and high school be reasonable?

Reply

Heather Macintosh

8:52 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

Great conversation!

What if we re-imagined school, forgot about what WE used to do, and put all of our pre-conceived notions aside. Would we design it exactly as it is today? Are there any ways we can improve upon the education our adolecscents and teenagers receive?

I would personally like to see my middle school child have recess & a chance to run around outdoors. I would rather if teachers didn't resort to yelling - ever. It would be great if there were more electives, less busy-work, less waiting for other kids to catch up, more child-driven & exploratory learning.

I would prefer if decisions about the school day schedule were set by educators who looked at scientific research spanning over 20 years that indicates children post-puberty experience a sleep phase shift that makes a 5:30 a.m. wake-up call for them the equivalent of a 3:30 a.m. wake-up call for me. I don't function well without the recommended sleep for my age, and I don't believe kids do either. For my high schooler to get 9.25 hours of sleep on a school night and still catch the bus on time, she would have to be asleep at 8:00 p.m.

It's an out-moded schedule that needs to be re-imagined.

Reply

Kim Dixon

10:10 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

Wow
I see no problem with the way things are I have raised 5 kids all of them went to school and held a part time job and was involved in young marines, now 3 of my sons have served or are now serving one son put himself through school to become a electrician and my daughter is now in high school and young marines and works for a restaurant my point to all of this is discipline having served myself for 22 years discipline is the bedrock to kids achievement And this is not some government funded study this is experience, proven to work for my family.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brook Hubbard

10:39 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

The problem is that yours is an anecdote, a single example. That does not mean that your results are indicative of the average family. These studies (which are not necessarily "government funded", as if that is a bad thing) take multiple samples from a varied population to determine what the norm is; it is that norm that forms the basis for these research conclusions.

We can spend all day throwing out "experiences", but said experiences are subject to personal bias and perception. Only through objective examination of a wide variety of examples can we begin to create an accurate picture of the truth. We may not like what is found, but that doesn't matter... it is scientific fact in the end.

Kim Dixon

7:09 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Again experience based results are just that results. The scientific fact you speak of has no results, what im saying is let there be a guinea pig town since some
Of you like studies and give it a two year go with latter start time. I bet the findings would be the same kids would be tired because they will stay up latter because they can.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brook Hubbard

9:09 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

A singular experience is not indicative of a whole; it is logical fallacy and the opposite of scientific thinking to propose it is. If we were to base everything on a singular experience, then a child might be afraid of dinosaurs because it made them cry once and not afraid of stoves because it happened to be off the first time they touched it. This was the fallacy of Freud, who created broad categories of mental disorders out of singular case studies.

Did you read the studies presented? These are not just a collection of data. These are longitudinal studies of a significant sample population, measuring everything from perception to ability and achievement to autonomous functions. You already have a "guinea pig town" in the form of consistent records of children over the course of their lives.

You continue to say our scientific fact has no results, but the results are clearly there in these studies, a major body of work that has existed since at least the 90's. It is your choice to ignore them because you don't agree with them. You are certainly entitled to form an opinion opposed to these findings, but that does not invalidate the findings and the data recorded. Until you can provide some research of your own that counters decades of our own, your statement is unsupported opinion with no validity.

Mark Donovan

6:11 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

So far, our Howard County Start School Later petition has gotten 820 signers in just a week. Join us at: http://tinyurl.com/sslhoco

Reply
Comment_arrow

Polly

9:33 am on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

@ Mark
I just signed the petition. This is long overdue.

Comment_arrow

Elle

9:38 am on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

I will sign it because I actually am for a later start time. Not because I think high school kids need more sleep but because I remember not liking that my kids had to go to the bus stop in the dark during the winter months. I also think elementary school kids that don't get home until 4:15 need an earlier start. That's a long day for them and they get so much homework these days. It makes for a long evening of trying to get tired elementary school kids to get homework done.

ECLibertarian

10:07 am on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

I must've been the odd ball - I always liked getting up early. Slept religiously every night 9 PM - 6 AM...I liked being the first one on the parking lot so I could get my favorite parking space!

Reply

NoPower

11:14 am on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

@Polly, wow! I hope your children are not as rude and disrespecful as you seem to be.
Good for you for signing the petition if that makes you oh so proud!

Reply

Kim Dixon

11:44 am on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

You all are right and I respect your opinions however I do not agree with them. But I will vote against anything that will only serve to increase my already excessive taxes.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brook Hubbard

12:34 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

How will changing school start times lead to more taxes?

Comment_arrow

woodbine5

9:08 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Kim, thanks for voicing this side. Mr. Hubbard you spew your research like a mid western bible thumper without what appears to be any consideration for unintended consequences. Howard County is FAMOUS for new innovative "ideas" which simply mask higher taxes. Has anyone heard about the new tax being imposed on Howard County Residents with regards to more "save the bay" legislation? Didn't think so. Well Mr. Ulman supported this tax out of Annapolis. Each county could choose to support it or not through their general funds or higher taxes. Mr. Ulman comment was "our residents can afford it-we will pass it on". Average increase: $500 dollars. Mr. Hubbard and others, you will have 100% of MY support for later start times, if in your volumes of research and acrimonious assaults on those that disagree with you, you include irrefutable research to show that taxes will NOT be affected. And please don't give us anecdotal research, include hard research on every county that increased start times around the county, that did not have any impact in any way, hidden tax or not, on any taxes in the corresponding county.

Comment_arrow

Brook Hubbard

9:38 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

I don't think any research I provide will satisfy you, seeing as you have set the goal post rather high. I could provide you with studies of financial effects on a few reported districts/schools, but you have said that wouldn't be enough. Seeing as you want precise financial data from ~every~ school system, that's a rather tall order from someone in a public forum.

As I am only a supporter of this movement, not someone who is directly working on it, perhaps one of them can fulfill your demands?

Of course, I could ask you the same: Can you provide me with a single school system that has enacted the program that has accrued more costs?

Elle

12:35 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

You're right and I take it back. I haven't signed it yet and I won't. I firmly believe that kids get babied way too much these days. You think a later start time will help? The studies may show they need more sleep but they won't get it, unless you start school at 4pm for them. They still won't go to bed early enough because now they'll have more time to play computer games and sit in chat rooms and hang out with friends.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brook Hubbard

1:45 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

"The studies may show they need more sleep but they won't get it, unless you start school at 4pm for them."

Hyperbole. There is no study that says anything of the sort.

Dr. Dwyer

1:00 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

@Elle. The idea is that they still go to bed on time assuming their parents are functional.

Reply

Jack

12:30 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

Discipline? Do any of you realize how few of us in this country actually serve? It is not discipline and those of us who serve do so generation after generation. Do not confuse military service with discipline and do not confuse the issues here.

What is disturbing is how far behind our apprentice superintendent and her hired friend, Amani-Dove are in the understanding of the research which is where the cost comes from as they strugle to comprehend it. These discussions on patch and all the information being presented is exactly what the hcpss needs to make intelligent decisions for our children. The post about the "total package" being reassessed is the most accurate I have heard.

I will sign and promote your petition from Howard county, Mount Airy and urge all of you who believe this school system is so good and we should not tamper with it to educate yourselves as to just where we really are.

Reply

Terra Ziporyn Snider, Ph.D.

6:51 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

The idea that the only way to return to later, healthier school hours is to reroute or add buses at exorbitant costs is a myth. Communities that have put student health and well-being first have found a variety of creative solutions, sometimes even saving money in the process. Start School Later addresses this, and many other myths and misinformation that cloud this issue, on its website: http://www.startschoollater.net/myths-and-misconceptions.html#answer1

Reply

Maribel Ibrahim

3:19 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

The issue of sleep deprivation is so critical that there is now legislation being introduced in the MD House of Delegates about it. Read up on HB 1462 and click the link below to tell your legislator to support HB 1462: www.blastroots.com/sslmd

Reply

NoPower

6:26 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013

thanks for the heads p maribel. I'll make sure to call to tell them to stop babying this new generation.

Reply

Joanne Brazinski

12:02 pm on Sunday, March 3, 2013

Thank you, Brook, for trying to steer the conversation back to fact vs. opinion. It is so much easier for people to claim their experience is universally true, but decisions should be made on evidence. I agree, the evidence supports medical fact that teenagers are not just young adults; they have different physical needs because they are not done growing, even if they seem adult-sized. If a simple thing like a half-hour later start time would help them, we owe it to them to seriously consider it. A knee-jerk "we've always done it this way" does not help anyone.

Reply

Max

1:58 am on Monday, March 4, 2013

Here's an opinion from a modern 15 year old teenager: school is starting too early.

I choose to go to bed around 10-11PM, but I won't fall asleep until 12-1, sometimes even 2. What am I doing? Laying in bed, trying to fall asleep, Not playing games or watching videos or texting friends on my laptop/smartphone. Going to bed early simply doesn't work. Because I need to leave for the bus at 6:30 for a school starting at 7:25 that takes 10 minutes to drive to, I wake up at 5:30. WIth that being too early, I oversleep 30mins. and cut breakfast.

I get home around 2:30 after school. By 4:30, I'm passed out due to exhaustion. I'm not purposely trying to sleep. Without anyone or anything to wake me up, I wake up from my nap around 8PM to do my homework and eat dinner, then go back to bed and attempt to fall asleep, which, once again, doesn't occur until after several hours of laying in bed.

I've made another observation. After a 6 hour shift on Saturday, I can fall asleep at 11PM and wake wake up at 8AM with ease. In the morning, I feel very refreshed, a feeling I never get on a school morning.

"Afterschool sports!" - also has kids at school at 5AM for physical activity. They're up by 4:30
"Drugs/Sex!" - also occurs AT SCHOOL
"Younger siblings!" teach them to watch themselves
"Babied" - Because bullying/family issues/eating disorders is worse than ever
"Work world" - College classes generally start around 10AM
"I could do it" teen life has changed since you were 16

Reply

riverhill highschooler

11:25 pm on Sunday, April 7, 2013

as a highschooler of riverhill highschool in Howard county, I think the main problem is the cirriculum overload. I try to sleep earlier when I can, but there is just too much homework. it's all I do when I come home from school is homework and studying. several of my friends and me have had breakdowns from the amount of work they give us at school and at home. Changing the school time may work but the main problem is the homework they assign that make the students, who put schoolwork first, stay up extremely late. also, to the parents who have Teen in highschool, don't force us to sleep earlier because sometimes it's required for us to stay up all night to do schoolwork.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Terri McCulley Hicks

2:14 pm on Monday, April 8, 2013

Well Played and Well thought out point, Riverhill High Schooler!!! lol I give you credit for posting this comment. But your Post to reduce homework is just proof Howard County really needs to step up thier game on English and Grammer. Don't know what grade you're in but Good Luck with the rest of your school years and/or college. :)

Leave a comment